McKinsey & CompanyChemical Pricing: Unified Algorithm or Frontline Judgment?
First run a pilot combining analytical recommendations with frontline review on '1–2 product lines × a small group of non-critical customers,' rather than repricing across the board. The core is to design it as an experiment that can be stopped, attributed, and reversed — not a contest to validate the algorithm.
Read the full case →FTI ConsultingFrench Telecom Liquidity Crisis: Full Freeze, or a Conditional Short-Term Funding Decision?
We recommend a very short-duration, revocable authorization mechanism for essential commitments rather than a full freeze: when cash position and funding gap evidence is unreliable, this path preserves necessary operational flexibility while limiting exposure through clear deadlines, accountable owners, and stop conditions, and can be revoked at any time — an advantage over a full freeze, which is difficult to reverse once executed.
Read the full case →AccentureAlmond Cooperative Supply Chain Planning: Commit Immediately to a Global Integrated Platform, or First Establish a Reversible Supply-Demand Evidence Baseline?
Recommend first establishing a time-boxed, stoppable supply-demand data and forecasting evidence baseline, and locking in the scope of the first integration phase; since the root cause (data definitions/quality/process/model/ownership) has not yet been pinpointed, committing directly to a global platform would lock in unvalidated assumptions, whereas the evidence-baseline path preserves the ability to reverse course and aligns with the committee's requirement for reversibility
Read the full case →