RWE decision governance
Contrary opinions exist, but nobody can stop the proposal. Do you approve the next major investment?
Decision owner:Board / capital committee
Verified analysis summary
What you are being asked to decideMore than €10 billion had been committed while major proposals shared the same rising-price assumptions.
Cost of getting it wrongA red team becomes ceremony while the same price assumptions keep driving billions in commitments.
Marcus · DecisionChoose the stop right before choosing another review method.
Evelyn · Evidence & riskThe common rising-price assumption creates correlated risk across proposals.
Sofia · Stakeholder impactWithout pause authority, dissent is documented but cannot protect capital.
Minerva Team's provisional judgmentA red team or reversal rule becomes a ritual unless someone can actually pause or change the proposal when contrary evidence appears.Set the capital threshold, pilot one bounded challenge process on the next proposal, and name who can pause it.
The question only you can resolveWho has explicit authority to pause the proposal when the reversal evidence appears?
See why the Minerva Team reached this judgment
Selected methodsRoot-cause analysis + option comparison
What would reverse itIf neither pilot connects contrary evidence to real pause authority, define the stop right before choosing a review method.
Official public sourceMcKinsey & Company · RWE decision-process interview
Analysis work receipt
1official source6model calls10/10decision checks125.7actual runtime