SFO × Gensler
The team wants to invest in metaverse navigation before the failed journey is proven. Do you fund it?
Decision owner:Innovation sponsor / airport executive
Verified analysis summary
What you are being asked to decideThe proposed answer was an emerging metaverse navigation solution.
Cost of getting it wrongYou can fund an impressive interface that solves the wrong traveler, place or accessibility barrier.
Marcus · DecisionTechnology selection must follow a bounded user failure, not precede it.
Evelyn · Evidence & riskNo observation yet isolates who gets lost, where, when or why.
Sofia · Stakeholder impactAccessibility risk makes a visually novel solution especially costly if the wrong users are centered.
Minerva Team's provisional judgmentThe most serious failure point, affected traveler, and accessibility constraints were still unknown.Observe where, when, and for whom wayfinding fails before committing to the tool.
The question only you can resolveWhich traveler failure must this investment measurably reduce?
See why the Minerva Team reached this judgment
Selected methodsRoot-cause analysis + option comparison
What would reverse itObservation isolates a failure that current signs cannot solve and the new approach can address accessibly.
Official public sourceMinerva University · Carl Kho / SFO × Gensler
Analysis work receipt
1official source7model calls10/10decision checks114.6actual runtime