08 · EY · Minerva judgment

Post-M&A Data Governance at a Gaming Company: Centralize Control First, or Define Shared Responsibilities and Autonomy Boundaries First?

Current product policyLast updated September 30, 2026

Watch the actual operation film →

Minerva judgment

Start by defining a small set of shared data responsibilities and principles, while preserving reversible autonomy boundaries: evidence shows the root causes of conflict have not been disaggregated (F6), the necessity of differences has not been proven (F4), and studios have raised disruption-risk concerns (F3). Under this uncertainty, a reversible, small-scope starting point is preferable to irreversible full centralization.

Decision owner in the teaching simulationGroup COO, in an independent educational simulation

Human-controlled next action

The decision owner (Group COO) convenes the data and risk team along with studio leads to first identify which data definitions/decisions are genuinely shared across studios, establish a minimal list of shared responsibilities with clear stop conditions, and maintain studio autonomy elsewhere.

What would reverse the recommendation

If diagnostic work (disaggregating the accountability/technology/capability/adoption risks referenced in F6) can be completed quickly and at low cost, and the results show that the root cause of the F5 inefficiency is truly the lack of common principles rather than technical or resource constraints, then a broader definition of shared responsibility should be adopted directly, rather than repeatedly testing with a reversible small-scope start. In that case, insisting on an incremental starting point would add unnecessary coordination cycles and time costs.

Illustration of people, information diagrams and decision options
Case theme illustration

AI-generated illustration, not an actual customer scene or product screenshot. It does not demonstrate outcomes or imply endorsement.

Official public source

EY · How strong data management becomes a real game-changer

Evidence and endorsement boundary:Independent teaching simulation. The named consulting firm supplied the public source only; it did not use, review, endorse, sponsor, certify or commission Minerva Advisor. This evidence does not claim customer results, ROI or a permanent service-level guarantee.

Inspect the evidence, then test your own decision context.

MINERVA DECISION READINESS REVIEW

Bring one decision you cannot afford to guess.

Minerva separates evidence, inference and unknowns, then shows options, the strongest objection and what would reverse the recommendation.

Start a Minerva Decision Readiness Review

Bring a real, de-identified decision. Google sign-in and product access are required; your plan and Decision Credits apply. You remain the decision-maker, and no email or external action is sent automatically.