Recommend first launching a short-term, time-boxed current-state and vendor evidence gate with defined stop conditions, to identify the root cause of manual rework and validate candidate platform fit before deciding platform lock-in scope; this path preserves reversibility without abandoning the feasibility of the 24-month timeline
Decision owner in the teaching simulationChair of the Enterprise Transformation Steering Committee, in an independent instructional simulation
Human-controlled next action
The Steering Committee Chair approves the timeline, scope, stop conditions, and accountable owners for the short-term evidence gate, and assigns the architecture and risk teams to execute root-cause analysis
What would reverse the recommendation
If the evidence gate results show that manual rework stems primarily from platform gaps rather than process, data, or organizational issues, and a clearly qualified candidate platform solution already exists, then proceeding to immediate lock-in is warranted; before that outcome emerges, any platform contract signing is treated as an irreversible commitment, requiring prior Steering Committee approval of stop conditions and escalation triggers per the risks shown in F5 and F4 (their specific definitions remain U3 unknowns requiring further clarification).
Decision review illustration
AI-generated illustration, not an actual customer scene or product screenshot. It does not demonstrate outcomes or imply endorsement.
Evidence and endorsement boundary:Independent teaching simulation. The named consulting firm supplied the public source only; it did not use, review, endorse, sponsor, certify or commission Minerva Advisor. This evidence does not claim customer results, ROI or a permanent service-level guarantee.
Inspect the evidence, then test your own decision context.
Bring a real, de-identified decision. Google sign-in and product access are required; your plan and Decision Credits apply. You remain the decision-maker, and no email or external action is sent automatically.