Decision evidence in this film
- Decision owner
- Global Chief HR Officer, in an independent training simulation
- Current judgment
- Recommend launching a fast, evidence-based screening with clear deadlines and stop conditions first, establishing a global common-baseline requirement and comparison criteria before deciding whether a full RFP is needed; this path is reversible, lower cost, and allows early cut-off of losses when evidence is insufficient
- Next evidence step
- The decision-maker assigns an owner to complete the fast evidence screening within the set deadline, clearly listing comparison criteria and stop/reversal conditions before reporting back for final sign-off
- Evidence that would change the decision
- If the fast screening cannot converge on credible global common-baseline and regional-difference comparison criteria within the set deadline (i.e., U1 remains unresolved), or if critical regulatory/integration constraints are found to have been overlooked (the risks indicated by F2, C1 materialize), the fast screening should be terminated and a full RFP launched instead
Public sourceMercer · Paving the Way for HCM Transformation